:shamrock: :shamrock:
viewtopic.php?f=43&t=15027 confrontinghyde spoke:
Ursus, I was there. I don't need you or anyone else to validate my personal account of Hyde.
As far as Hyde making "concessions" regarding medication- did you read my post to begin with? Hyde has no authority to tell anyone what medication they can and cannot take. There was no concession due to "cultural trends." Stop making crap up and scouring the internet for whatever snipit of text you can copy and paste to support your opinion of the day.
Hyde is not a good place. I don't support it, but a lot of what you post on here is as off-base and misinformed as anything that goes on at Hyde.
PS who gives a crap what the etiology of Hyde's dogma is? I sure don't.
confrontinghyde spoke:
Re: For Current Students at Hyde School
New postby confrontinghyde » Today, 00:49
PPS "correlation does not mean causation."
Ursus spoke:
Jeeezzz... you seem to have some issues with someone, but I'm not sure it's me! Sorry if the way I phrase things seems to piss you off; it surely isn't intended to!
In my day, there was almost no one talking any medication. There was even talk to the effect of that going that route was a cop-out. That kid's problems were all moral failings and character flaws. That has changed, not necessarily because Hyde wanted to, but because the way our society views that issue has changed, i.e, that of kids taking meds. And I do, personally, see accommodating that as a concession that Hyde has made due to economic realities, but you're more than welcome, of course, to disagree with me.
I don't see where I even addressed the issue of whether or not Hyde has the "authority to tell anyone what medication they can and cannot take." However, on a related note, that is, on how Hyde's philosophical stance on medication may have affected kids' access to it, it appears that on at least two occasions a kid has been sent to outpost and their bipolar meds were simply "forgotten."
If you feel that strongly that what I post is "off-base and misinformed," how come you're not on here trying to refute it?
Ursus spoke:
confrontinghyde wrote:
PS who gives a crap what the etiology of Hyde's dogma is? I sure don't.
Ursus:
Personally, I find that figuring out where Hyde's psychobabble comes from ... goes a long way towards putting it in its rightful place. You may very well not feel that way, and apparently don't.
confrontinghyde wrote:
PPS correlation does not mean causation.
Ursus:
No, there is a tremendous amount I don't know of that went into Joe's witches brew. He seems to have picked up bits and pieces from here and there. I just report on what I find, for what it's worth.
And I am sure that the "official Hyde version" thereof, while certainly informative, is apt to be more than a little skewed and incomplete.
If you know of other info, why not report/discuss it here?
DannyB II spoke:
:notworthy:
Get what I have been saying hotshot, listen more you may learn.
You have opinions anybody can have them.
BTW, you don't just report what you find that would be fine, you take it a step further.
Danny