Author Topic: Womanhood Not a Medical Condition  (Read 3432 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Womanhood Not a Medical Condition
« on: May 25, 2007, 04:39:24 PM »
FDA approves pill that stops periods; is womanhood a disease? (opinion)

Conventional medicine has, for decades, preyed upon the "symptoms of womanhood" and attempted to transform every female activity from childbirth to menstruation into a disease requiring chemical treatment. Today, the FDA approved Lybrel, a daily pill for women that stops periods... forever.

The concept behind such a pill is based on the false idea that menstruation is a disease requiring a medical fix. Most sane people would agree that menstruation is, in fact, a natural biological function and not a disease. So why take a pill to stop it?

If you ask the women taking this pill, it's because their periods are extremely painful or inconvenient. Taking Lybrel to stop the period is a typical Western-mindset approach to all ailments: Mask the symptoms and ignore the cause. Painful periods have a cause, mostly related to hormone imbalances caused by poor nutritional habits, lack of exercise and exposure to toxic chemicals in foods, medicines and personal care products (which contain hundreds of hormone-disrupting chemicals). Rather than addressing these underlying causes of poor health, many consumers wish to simply mask the symptoms and make them disappear at any cost, including ingesting potentially toxic prescription drugs whose long-term safety record is entirely unknown.

This desire to eliminate the symptoms of disease rather than addressing the underlying cause of poor health is a uniquely Western approach to health treatment. Americans mask joint pain with deadly COX-2 inhibitor drugs, they mask nutritional deficiencies with antidepressant drugs, and they mask poor cardiovascular health with statin drugs and blood thinners (which are made from rat poison chemicals, by the way, and that's not an exaggeration). It's like taking your car to a mechanic and instead of the guy fixing your engine, he just takes a can of spray paint and sprays over the engine warning lights on your dashboard. Problem solved! No more engine warning lights!
[Sound like the Industry?]

Women who take Lybrel to stop their periods are, in my opinion, doing the same thing with their health. And they're potentially taking a huge risk since no one knows the long-term consequences of such blatant disruption of normal hormone cycles. You can bet, however, that the results won't be positive. Although this is just a guess, I believe that long-term use of such synthetic chemicals may greatly increase the risk of hormone-related cancers such as breast cancer and cervical cancer. They may also cause blood stasis in the abdomen and could very easily, in my view, result in increased endometriosis and severe reproductive problems.

Both the manufacturer of this drug and the FDA, of course, say this chemical is perfectly safe. Then again, FDA-approved pharmaceuticals are right now killing 100,000 Americans each year, even when used as directed. Just one drug, Vioxx, reportedly killed well over 50,000 Americans according to the FDA's own senior drug safety whistleblower, and yet the FDA voted to put that drug right back on the market!

This is a critical point to understand here: The FDA believes that a drug that kills 50,000 people is not dangerous enough to pull off the market. Once you understand that point, some questions come to mind about Lybrel. How many women might die from the side effects of this drug? No one knows. It could be zero or a hundred thousand. If no more than 50,000 women are ultimately killed by it, the FDA likely claim that's still within a safety margin and that "the drug benefits outweigh its risks!"
[Window of loss...just like the Industry!]

What, exactly, is the level of fatalities required for the FDA to consider a drug "too dangerous?" Because apparently a drug that kills 50,000 people is not dangerous enough for the FDA to restrict its use. In fact, the FDA has never announced what level of fatalities it considers high enough to trigger a drug recall. It may be that a drug killing 100,000 people would also be considered "safe" by the FDA. Or perhaps even 250,000 people.
Technically, there is no level of death that cannot be declared "acceptably safe" by the FDA. (An herb, on the other hand, is pronounced as "dangerous at any dose" if it causes even a single fatality. This extreme double standard is standard operating procedure at the FDA, where all herbs are considered dangerous until proven safe, and all drugs are considered safe until proven dangerous.)

The hysteria of modern medicine
In my opinion, any woman taking Lybrel is embarking on a foolish experiment with her own health. It is not merely a dangerous course of action to pursue, it is the ultimate surrender of personal responsibility for one's own health. It also admits to a male-dominated medical system that womanhood is, indeed, some sort of terrible disease that requires treatment.

Note that the words hysteria and hysterectomy (the surgical removal of the uterus) have the same word roots. That's because a hysterectomy was a procedure originally developed by men and used as a surgical weapon to make women "less hysterical." It was long believed that the uterus was an organ that caused insanity!  :rofl: In reality, the organ that no doubt causes the most insanity is the penis, but that's another story... notice that you don't see male doctors recommending penisectomies as a cure for male insanity.  ::roflmao::
[Lorena Bobbitt might be able to speak to the efficacy of that.]

Although, indeed, we would all be much safer if the arrogant men pushing these nonsense pharmaceuticals weren't so cocky to begin with. Only women are advised to have their organs removed for emotional reasons. You ever notice that when it comes to cancer treatments for such organs, there's a cry to "Save the testicle!" but "Remove the breast!" ?

(The word menstruate, by the way, has its roots in Latin, where the word mensis means "month." It has no relational meaning to the modern English word "men.")

Men have always dominated Western medicine, and they have always used chemicals and surgeries to control or dominate women. Even today, the male-dominated breast cancer industry is a for-profit system that preys upon women through harmful mammograms that actually cause cancer and produce shockingly high rates of false positives. As I've stated in previous articles here on NewsTarget, mammography harms 10 women for every 1 that it helps.
[Wow! So much in common with the Industry.]

Conventional breast cancer treatment is largely a medical hoax where men use fear to control women by corralling them into treatments where they can poison them with chemotherapy or slice off their breasts. (Sound insane? It is.)

My advice to women is to learn from your painful periods rather than trying to dissociate yourself from them. A painful period is a messenger that's trying to tell you something. Perhaps you need to take a new look at your diet, your lifestyle and your use of toxic cosmetics and skin care products that disrupt normal hormone cycles. Painful periods can be transformed into painless periods through natural medicine. Chinese medicine is especially good at supporting this transformation. Diet plays a huge role, too.

Take responsibility for your health rather than abandoning it
Solving the health problem rather than simply masking it is the responsible thing to do with your body. It's not an overnight solution like the seductively easy Lybrel pill, but it is a far wiser and more wholesome solution that honors your body rather than hijacking its natural functions. Chemical are not the answer to your health problems. They are merely seductive, harmful synthetic substances that will inevitably produce harmful side effects.

If you think your periods are painful today, just imagine the emotional pain of being diagnosed with breast cancer, undergoing chemotherapy that nearly kills you and having a mastectomy. Once you start down the path of chemical suppression of symptoms of pain, you begin a journey into the world of harmful medicine that will only leave you diseased and bankrupt, addicted to a dozen pharmaceuticals and suffering from liver failure, kidney disease, brain fog and chronic pain. Think carefully about what you're doing to your body. It's the only one you've got, and nature intends for a woman to have periods. Menstruation is not a disease. And womanhood is not a medical condition. Don't fall for the male-dominated quackery that passes for medicine today, and don't play pharmaceutical roulette with your body by taking Lybrel.

###

About the author: Mike Adams is a natural health author and technology pioneer with a strong interest in personal health, the environment and the power of nature to help us all heal He has authored and published thousands of articles, interviews, consumers guies, and books on topics like health and the environment, impacting the lives of millions of readers around the world who are experiencing phenomenal health benefits from reading his articles. Adams is an independent journalist with strong ethics who does not get paid to write articles about any product or company. In 2007, Adams launched EcoLEDs, a maker of energy efficient LED lights that greatly reduce CO2 emissions. He also founded an environmentally-friendly online retailer called BetterLifeGoods.com that uses retail profits to help support consumer advocacy programs. He's also a veteran of the software technology industry, having founded a personalized mass email software product used to deliver email newsletters to subscribers. Adams volunteers his time to serve as the executive director of the Consumer Wellness Center, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization, and pursues hobbies such as Pilates, Capoeira, nature macrophotography and organic gardening. Known as the 'Health Ranger,' Adams' personal health statistics and mission statements are located at www.HealthRanger.org
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Oz girl

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1459
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Womanhood Not a Medical Condition
« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2007, 09:03:50 PM »
I say bring this drug on!!! periods are not a medical condition but the are annoying. I never went in for the school of feminism that was all about celebrating womans "connection to the earth" or any of that crap. As i am not planning kids I wouldget rid of "the mean reds' once and for all!
BTW I note that the author was a guy. i wonder if he would feel differently if he ever got a period
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
n case you\'re worried about what\'s going to become of the younger generation, it\'s going to grow up and start worrying about the younger generation.-Roger Allen

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Womanhood Not a Medical Condition
« Reply #2 on: May 25, 2007, 09:44:50 PM »
It can be a nuisance, for sure. But, I do think the health risks he detailed are valid and worthy of serious consideration. Not to mention, one of the side effects is "unscheduled" breakthrough bleeding.
http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2 ... ybrel.html
So, how free is one if they have to wear a pad everyday, just in case?
One of the warnings.... because a regular period is eliminated, women might not realize that they are pregnant.  :rofl:

Would it be such a nuisance if women weren't expected to function in all their many capacities right through the red wave? What if we adopted the Native American way... Moon Lodge. Women have no responsibilities and are waited on hand and foot while they 'dream together'. That's what I call respect. I bet we'd see fewer cases of PMS and Menopausal symptoms if we were so lucky to have that kind of treatment.

Isn't this at least in part about increasing productivity and decreasing absenteeism in the workplace, not to mention billions in profit for the pharmaceutical companies and cancer 'treatment' industry down the road?

And how bout the name.... Lybrel..... Liberal.... Lybrel... Liberal...

Such a liberating ring....
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline try another castle

  • Registered Users
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2693
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Womanhood Not a Medical Condition
« Reply #3 on: May 25, 2007, 10:51:46 PM »
It's much easier to just start testosterone injections.

Although... there are some irreversible side effects. Such as...becoming a man.

Worked for me, though.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Oz girl

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1459
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Womanhood Not a Medical Condition
« Reply #4 on: May 26, 2007, 04:41:51 AM »
well I like being a lady castle just not everything about it! :roll:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
n case you\'re worried about what\'s going to become of the younger generation, it\'s going to grow up and start worrying about the younger generation.-Roger Allen

Offline try another castle

  • Registered Users
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2693
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Womanhood Not a Medical Condition
« Reply #5 on: May 26, 2007, 05:35:27 AM »
I like being a lady, too. I'm a pretty lady with a pretty little dress.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Oz girl

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1459
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Womanhood Not a Medical Condition
« Reply #6 on: May 27, 2007, 07:47:58 AM »
here is slate's take on the issue

http://www.slate.com/id/2166983/fr/flyout
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
n case you\'re worried about what\'s going to become of the younger generation, it\'s going to grow up and start worrying about the younger generation.-Roger Allen

Offline Nihilanthic

  • Posts: 3931
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Womanhood Not a Medical Condition
« Reply #7 on: May 30, 2007, 03:55:50 PM »
Mask the symptoms and ignore the cause. <- the crux of why we're here... though for big pains (children) that don't always cause bleeding  :rofl:

Also, deb, I've heard to the extent there is no real medical reason why women need periods at all. But then again we're still sorting out the whole biochemical soup that is "human" so it might take a while until its known for sure.

Castle - Testosterone has side effects for men as well, like receding hairlines and raging tempers.  :(
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
DannyB on the internet:I CALLED A LAWYER TODAY TO SEE IF I COULD SUE YOUR ASSES FOR DOING THIS BUT THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE.

CCMGirl on program restraints: "DON\'T TAZ ME BRO!!!!!"

TheWho on program survivors: "From where I sit I see all the anit-program[sic] people doing all the complaining and crying."

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Womanhood Not a Medical Condition
« Reply #8 on: May 30, 2007, 04:56:51 PM »
Quote from: ""Nihilanthic""
Also, deb, I've heard to the extent there is no real medical reason why women need periods at all. But then again we're still sorting out the whole biochemical soup that is "human" so it might take a while until its known for sure.


Really. Thank goodness we have scientists to correct the errors in nature.
Women who don't have menses are undernourished/unhealthy.
I'd like to read the thinking on that. Any links?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline try another castle

  • Registered Users
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2693
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Womanhood Not a Medical Condition
« Reply #9 on: May 30, 2007, 07:38:57 PM »
Actually, to some extent, niles is right. For example, I can still become pregnant, even though I no longer have periods nor would have any uteran lining to nourish the fetus.

It is extremely rare, but possible. I doubt the child would survive to term, though, even if I stopped my hormones on conception.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Oz girl

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1459
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Womanhood Not a Medical Condition
« Reply #10 on: May 30, 2007, 07:56:07 PM »
Quote from: ""Deborah""
Women who don't have menses are undernourished/unhealthy.
I'd like to read the thinking on that. Any links?


But that makes no sense. If transexuals 10 year olds and women over around 50 are not prone to being malnourished why would women who opt not to have periods be? Afterall we have been tinkering with nature on womens issues for a long time now.  Nobody wants to go back to the days when we had babies on the kitchen table and a high infant mortality rate.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
n case you\'re worried about what\'s going to become of the younger generation, it\'s going to grow up and start worrying about the younger generation.-Roger Allen

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Womanhood Not a Medical Condition
« Reply #11 on: May 30, 2007, 09:34:22 PM »
I think maybe I wasn't clear.
Barring any intentional intervention, women have a period every month. I don't believe it's a mistake that needs a 'fix'. Those who don't are typically unhealthy, malnourished, stressed. There have been reports of girls in programs loosing/skipping periods due to inadequate nutrition and stress. There's some discussion in this thread
http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.ph ... 917#122917

Woops, there's one other normal time in which women don't have a moon time- while they're nursing an infant.... natural birth control. Also interesting is the increase in breast cancer amongst women who take the pills and forgo breastfeeding.  

I've read that having menses is one reason women typically out live men. Once a month we have the opportunity to dump a load of toxins and create new blood. If you aren't having periods, might want to consider taking saunas or something. But, to my knowledge, there's no way to minimize the excess estrogen from birth control products which will increase the risk of breast/uterine cancer, diabetes, gallstones, asthma, blood clots, and strokes. All the xeno-estrogens [http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?p=95332#95332]  in our environment, only increase the risks.... but what risks we take and how we want to go is a personal decision which I support. Just as with psych drugs/torture treatments, I prefer informed consent and access to alternatives.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Womanhood Not a Medical Condition
« Reply #12 on: May 30, 2007, 10:52:48 PM »
Quote from: ""Deborah""
Quote from: ""Nihilanthic""
Also, deb, I've heard to the extent there is no real medical reason why women need periods at all. But then again we're still sorting out the whole biochemical soup that is "human" so it might take a while until its known for sure.

Really. Thank goodness we have scientists to correct the errors in nature.
Women who don't have menses are undernourished/unhealthy.
I'd like to read the thinking on that. Any links?


Just because sick women do not have menses, does not mean you are sick if you don't have menses....
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Womanhood Not a Medical Condition
« Reply #13 on: May 30, 2007, 11:56:35 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Quote from: ""Deborah""
Quote from: ""Nihilanthic""
Also, deb, I've heard to the extent there is no real medical reason why women need periods at all. But then again we're still sorting out the whole biochemical soup that is "human" so it might take a while until its known for sure.

Really. Thank goodness we have scientists to correct the errors in nature.
Women who don't have menses are undernourished/unhealthy.
I'd like to read the thinking on that. Any links?

Just because sick women do not have menses, does not mean you are sick if you don't have menses....


Here's a list of 101 causes of amenorrhea (absence of periods)
http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/symptoms/ ... causes.htm
They all indicate disease or stress or a general unhealthy state.
I'd really like to read the information you apparently have read. Links?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline try another castle

  • Registered Users
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2693
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Womanhood Not a Medical Condition
« Reply #14 on: May 31, 2007, 02:36:24 AM »
Quote
Here's a list of 101 causes of amenorrhea (absence of periods)


Otherwise known as 101 slices of heaven.  :P
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »