On 2005-11-18 15:56:00, Anonymous wrote:
"
On 2005-11-18 15:38:00, Anonymous wrote:
You're right.
The Washington Post is part of the real world. In the real world people who want something done ask nicely or are told to kindly bug off.
We're not in Straight anymore.
Class dismissed."
I wasn't talking about my opinion, but my critique being like a class paper. I was trying to write a logical analysis of his article. I know people are going to see things differently, but anyways, I don't know if anyone is suggesting it's a good idea to come across like crazed ex-druggies in sending Matthews letters. Forget about offending him, we will look like morons. And I don't think anybody has suggested that we be rude to the editors, after all, they didn't write the story, and I would assume if they are even mediocre journalists or have any sense of ethics whatsoever, they would be a thousand times more likely to respond positively to our story. But I think that a certain sense of anger is justified and can add weight to our story. I do think this Matthews guy sounds totally beyond reach, and I strongly feel that no matter what anybody says, he's not going to change his mind about this.